Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
JKC Australia LNG Pty Ltd v AkzoNobel NV (No 6) [2023] FCA 1616 File numbers: WAD 448 of 2017 WAD 162 of 2021
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2023
Catchwords: COSTS - transfer application - whether costs should follow the event in relation to interlocutory application - whether costs to be taxed and paid forthwith - where transfer application discrete and stand-alone - orders made
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 1.35, 40.13
Cases cited: Alstom Power Ltd v Yokogawa Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] SASC 87 Australian Flight Test Services v Minister for Industry, Science and Technology [1996] FCA 288 Axent Holdings Pty Ltd v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] FCA 6 BHP Billiton Limited v Schultz [2004] HCA 61; (2004) 221 CLR 400 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 5) [2018] FCA 19 JKC Australia LNG Pty Ltd v AkzoNobel NV (No 5) [2023] FCA 1248 The Owners - Strata Plan No 87231 v 3A Composites GmbH (No 4) [2020] FCA 1573 Watson v Kriticos (Costs Payable Forthwith) [2022] FCA 4 W Hoy Pty Ltd v W.T.H Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 506
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate