Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BJI20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1632 File number(s): VID 548 of 2022
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION - application for judicial review of decision of the Minister – decision of the Minister not to revoke a mandatory cancellation of absorbed person visa pursuant to s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Minister failed to consider representations made by the applicant that she may or would face violence, discrimination and other harm by reason of her sexuality if she were removed – whether the Minister failed to consider representations concerning the prospect of indefinite detention – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 189, 197C(3), 198, 476A, 501, 501CA(3)(b), 501CA(4), 501G(1)(e)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593; [2003] FCAFC 184 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp [1948] 1 KB 223 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 231 FCR 513; [2015] FCAFC 83 AZAFQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 243 FCR 451; [2016] FCAFC 105 BNGP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 111 BNGP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 878 CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 268 FCR 362; [2019] FCAFC 46 Chamoun v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 276 FCR 75; [2020] FCAFC 66 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 DFTD v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 859 DFTD v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 281 FCR 209; [2020] FCAFC 207 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 278 FCR 529; [2020] FCAFC 110 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 73 ALD 321 ECE21 v Minister for Home Affairs (2023) 297 FCR 422; [2023] FCAFC 52 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs (2021) 289 FCR 100; [2021] FCAFC 217 EXT20 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 291 FCR 55; [2022] FCAFC 72 Ezegbe v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 164 ALD 139; [2019] FCA 216 Galuak v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 798 Guclukol v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 169 ALD 279; [2020] FCA 61 Guclukol v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2020) 279 FCR 611; [2020] FCAFC 148 GXXS v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 468 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 628; [2018] FCAFC 225 Jabari v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 98 JSMJ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 718 KXXH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2022) 292 FCR 15; [2022] FCAFC 111 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589; [2019] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CPA16 (2019) 268 FCR 379; [2019] FCAFC 40 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Le (2016) 244 FCR 56; [2016] FCAFC 120 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR (2011) 241 CLR 594; [2011] HCA 1 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611; [2010] HCA 16 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323; [2001] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SZANS (2005) 141 FCR 586; [2005] FCAFC 41 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane (2021) 274 CLR 398; [2021] HCA 41 MNLR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2021) 283 FCR 525; [2021] FCAFC 35 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 273 CLR 506; [2021] HCA 17 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 178 ALD 536; [2022] HCA 26 Nguyen v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 170 ALD 38; [2020] FCA 127 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 178 ALD 304; [2022] HCA 17 RRFM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 27 Shi v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 136 TPTN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 788 WKMZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2021) 285 FCR 463; [2021] FCAFC 55
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate