Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Keane v Woolworths Group Limited [2023] FCA 1634 File number: SAD 132 of 2023
Judgment of: ROFE J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether to grant an extension of time to file an application seeking leave to appeal from a decision of this Court – relevant principles discussed – no explanation for significant delay and no reasonable prospects of appeal succeeding – application dismissed.
Legislation: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 BQQ15 v Minister For Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 218 Hunter Vally Developments Pty Ltd v Minister for Home Affairs and Environment (1984) 3 FCR 344 Kalanje v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1618 Katoa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2022) 403 ALR 604 Keane v Woolworths Group Ltd [2023] FCA 379 Khondoker v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 654 Mehmood v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (2013) 141 ALD 339 Mr K v The Employer [2021] FWC 2132 Pal v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] FCA 1483 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis Au Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 573 Sang v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1572 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate