Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Royal Express Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) v Huang, in the matter of Royal Express Pty Ltd (No 7) [2023] FCA 1648 File number(s): VID 287 of 2021
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2023
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – whether voluminous or complex evidence can be adduced in summary tables pursuant to s 50 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – consideration of relevant principless – application allowed.
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 50
Cases cited: ACCC v World Netsafe Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 519 Charles Parsons & Co Pty Ltd v Express Publications Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1031 R v Connors [2016] ACTSC 137 Re Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd; ASIC v Hobbs [2012] NSWSC 568 Thackray v Gunns Plantations Ltd [2011] VSC 380
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr S. Rosewarne with Ms D. Williams
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Allens
ORDERS VID 287 of 2021
BETWEEN: ROYAL EXPRESS PTY LTD (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 159 689 139) Plaintiff
AND: DI HUANG First Defendant
MENGQIU JI Second Defendant
FUSION J PTY LTD (ACN 607 541 202) (and others named in the Schedule) Fourth Defendant
order made by: MCEVOY J DATE OF ORDER: 21 DECEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate