Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mutton (liquidator) v De Matteis, in the matter of De Matteis Pty Ltd (in liq) [2023] FCA 1649 File number(s): VID 582 of 2022
Judgment of: HORAN J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2023
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – review of sequestration order made by Registrar of the Court – hearing de novo of creditor's petition – where parties agree that petition should be dismissed and sequestration order should be set aside – whether orders should be made for payment of trustee's remuneration, costs and expenses – whether respondent debtor should be liable for trustee's remuneration, costs and expenses – whether order setting aside sequestration order should be made conditional on payment of trustee's remuneration, costs and expenses
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 52(1), 52(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A, 36A Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) r 4.06
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Bechara v Bates (2021) 286 FCR 166 Boensch v Somerville Legal (2021) 286 FCR 293 Flint v Busuttil (2013) 216 FCR 375 Kyriackou v Shield Mercantile Pty Ltd (No.2) [2004] FCA 1338 Porter v Ghasemi (2021) 286 FCR 556 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corporation (1996) 67 FCR 65 Robson v Body Corporate for Sanderling at Kings Beach CTS 2942 (2021) 286 FCR 494 The Austral Brick Company Pty Ltd v Daskalovski [1998] FCA 782 Totev v Sfar (2008) 167 FCR 193
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate