Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Proctor & Gamble Australia Pty Limited (No 3) [2023] FCA 1650 File number: NSD 307 of 2023
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – determination of appropriate costs order – where application successful in part – where cross-claim successful – where applicant rejected offer of compromise
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 25.01, 25.14
Cases cited: RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Proctor & Gamble Australia Pty Limited [2023] FCA 383 RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Proctor & Gamble Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2023] FCA 1491
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of last submission/s: 11 December 2023 (Applicant) 8 December 2023 (Respondent)
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Vincent
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr E Heerey KC and Ms F St John
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ashurst Australia
ORDERS NSD 307 of 2023
BETWEEN: RB (HYGIENE HOME) AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 629 549 506) Applicant
AND: PROCTOR & GAMBLE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 396 245) Respondent
AND BETWEEN: PROCTOR & GAMBLE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 396 245) Cross-Claimant
AND: RB (HYGIENE HOME) AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 629 549 506) Cross-Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate