Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Zhang v Zhang [2023] FCA 1660 File number(s): VID 610 of 2023
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2023
Catchwords: INJUNCTIONS – where a judge granted after an inter partes hearing an application for a freezing order – where the parties in respect of which the freezing order was sought declined to adduce evidence at that hearing – whether material changes of circumstances since the freezing order was made – where no such changes established – interlocutory application to discharge freezing order dismissed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 75
Cases cited: Chanel Ltd v FW Woolworth & Co Ltd [1981] 1 WLR 485 Paras v Public Service Body Head of the Department of Infrastructure (No 2) [2006] FCA 652; (2006) 152 IR 352
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 71
Date of hearing: 13 December 2023
Counsel for the Applicants: CM Archibald KC with P Annabell
Solicitor for the Applicants: Gilbert + Tobin
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: D Pritchard SC with N Kabilafkas
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Juris Cor Legal
Counsel for the Third and Fourth Respondents: D Merriman
Solicitor for the Third and Fourth Respondents: GWH & Associates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate