Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
HBMH v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2024] FCA 8 File number(s): WAD 314 of 2023
Judgment of: FEUTRILL J
Date of judgment: 11 January 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for interlocutory injunction to prevent the applicant's removal from Australia – where applicant made a request for the Minister to exercise powers under s 195A and s 197AB of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) that was referred to the Minister and the Minister decided not to consider the exercise of powers – whether request referred to Minister according to law – whether Minister's decision not to consider exercise of powers according to law – where Minister decided to consider individual detainees in cohorts through departmental group intervention submissions under s 195A and s 197AB – where applicant included in departmental submission – whether Minister made a procedural decision to consider the exercise of power under s 195A or s 197AB with respect to the applicant – where applicant has medical conditions affecting his fitness to travel – whether 'reasonable practicability' for the purposes of s 198 is a jurisdictional fact – whether decision that it is reasonably practicable to remove applicant legally unreasonable –whether serious question to be tried – whether balance of convenience weighs in favour of injunction
Legislation: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) s 153 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 32AD(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 48B, 189, 195A, 196(1), 197AB, 198, 198(2B), 417, 476, 500(1)(ba), 501(3A), 501CA(4),
Cases cited: AOZ23 v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 1312 ASU22 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1326 AUR23 v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 1394 AUR23 v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2023] FCA 1440 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 63; (2001) 208 CLR 199 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46; (2006) 227 CLR 57 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd [1968] HCA 1; (1968) 118 CLR 618 Beyazkilinc v Manager, Baxter Immigration Reception and Processing Centre [2006] FCA 1368; (2006) 155 FCR 465 BJM16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 995 Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia [1985] FCA 48; (1985) 5 FCR 464 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; (2019) 268 CLR 29 CPK20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 825 Davis v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 213; (2022) 288 FCR 23 Davis v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 10; (2023) 408 ALR 381 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 HBMH v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 1527 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29; (2016) 259 CLR 180 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 877 NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 37 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [1998] HCA 30; (1998) 195 CLR 1 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 41; (2010) 243 CLR 319 Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] HCA 31; (2012) 246 CLR 636 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicants S134 [2003] HCA 1; (2003) 211 CLR 441 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Fejzullahu [2000] HCA 23; (2000) 171 ALR 341 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; (2011) 217 FCR 238 Tait v The Queen [1962] HCA 57; (1962) 108 CLR 620 WKMZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 55; (2021) 285 FCR 463
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate