Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd v Maroon (No 2) [2024] FCA 14 File number: NSD 31 of 2022
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 16 January 2024
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – whether there is any justifiable basis to adjourn the hearing – whether requirements for a sequestration order have been established – the Court's discretion to not make sequestration orders under s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 40(1)(g), 41(1), 41(3), 43(1)(b)(i), 43(1)(b)(ii), 44(1)(a), 44(1)(c), 52(1), 52(5) Bankruptcy Regulations 2021 (Cth) r 10 Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) rr 4.04(1)(a), 4.06 Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 4.05(1), 30.21(1)(b)(i)
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd v Maroon [2023] FCA 1399 Curtis v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 144; 225 FCR 458 Toyota Finance Australia Ltd v Youssef Berro [2022] FCA 497
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 33
Date of hearing: 16 January 2024
Counsel for the Applicant B Koch
Solicitor for the Applicant Independent Legal
Counsel for the First Respondent The First Respondent did not appear.
ORDERS NSD 31 of 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate