Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
SGTX v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 27 Review of: SGTX and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2022] AATA 2536 (10 August 2022)
File number(s): VID 643 of 2022
Judgment of: HESPE J
Date of judgment: 29 January 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for extension of time for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision not to revoke mandatory cancellation of visa – whether Tribunal fell into error by making an irrational or legally unreasonable finding about Applicant's future risk of re-offending – whether the Tribunal fell into error by making a decision that was legally unreasonable or by not giving due consideration to Applicant's representations that he was de facto stateless
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499, 500, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: CKL21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCAFC 70; (2022) 293 FCR 634 DCP16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 91 Garland v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 144 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Khalil v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1134 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; (2010) 243 CLR 164 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 400 ALR 417 RJE v Secretary to the Department of Justice (2008) 21 VR 526 Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 673; (2014) 225 FCR 424
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate