Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Communications and Media Authority v V Marketing Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2024] FCA 34 File number: QUD 235 of 2019
Judgment of: THOMAS J
Date of judgment: 29 January 2024
Catchwords: COMMUNICATIONS LAW – telemarketing calls to numbers on the Do Not Call Register – ancillary contraventions – whether the fourth respondent aided, abetted, counselled or procured a contravention of the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 (Cth) – whether the fourth respondent had knowledge of material facts of the contravention – whether the fourth respondent exercised control over the contraventions – HELD: application against the fourth respondent dismissed – fourth respondent not knowingly concerned with the contraventions
Legislation: Do Not Call Register Act 2006 (Cth) Spam Act 2003 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Communications and Media Authority v FHT Travel Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 550 Australian Communications and Media Authority v Mobilegate Ltd (a company incorporated in Hong Kong) (No 8) (2010) 275 ALR 293; [2010] FCA 1197 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v SensaSlim Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 5) (2014) 98 ACSR 347; [2014] FCA 340 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (in liq) (2015) 235 FCR 181; [2015] FCA 342 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473 Pereira v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 82 ALR 217 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate