Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Stanford v DePuy International Pty Ltd (No 8) [2024] FCA 35 File number: NSD 213 of 2011
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 1 February 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceeding – group member settlement scheme previously approved by Court – interlocutory application by administrator of settlement scheme – application seeking approval of payment of administrative costs – certain costs disputed by respondents – where administration costs time costed – whether costs relate to work properly undertaken – whether costs are fair and reasonable – whether any other reason to disallow or discount costs – administrative costs approved in full – costs of application not granted
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 6) [2016] FCA 1452 Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 7) [2017] FCA 748
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 112
Date of hearing: 15 May 2023
Counsel for applicants: Ms Z Hillman
Solicitors for applicants: Maurice Blackburn
Counsel for respondents: Mr R Dick SC with Mr J Entwisle
Solicitors for respondents: Barry Nilsson
ORDERS NSD 213 of 2011
BETWEEN: TAMMY STANFORD First Applicant
JAMIE DUNSMORE Second Applicant MAURICE BLACKBURN PTY LTD AND SHINE LAWYERS PTY LIMITED (IN THEIR CAPACITY AS JOINT ADMINISTRATORS OF THE SETTLEMENT SCHEME) Third Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate