Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Muffet v Qantas Superannuation Limited [2024] FCA 39 File number: NSD 747 of 2023
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 1 February 2024
Catchwords: SUPERANNUATION – appeal from a determination of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) – where AFCA determined that the first respondent's calculation of the applicant's defined benefit was fair and reasonable
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1053, 1055, 1057 Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Reeves v Nulis Nominees (Australia) Ltd (Trustee) [2022] FCA 627
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 64
Date of hearing: 15 November 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr V Bedrossian SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr E Dalgleish, Australian and International Pilots Association
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms D Hogan-Doran SC and Mr D Fuller
Solicitor for the First Respondent: King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Burnett
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Becketts Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 747 of 2023
BETWEEN: PETER MUFFET Applicant
AND: QANTAS SUPERANNUATION LIMITED (ACN 003 806 960) First Respondent
AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY LIMITED (ACN 620 494 340) Second Respondent
order made by: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 1 February 2024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate