Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Globaltech Corporation Pty Ltd (No 5) [2024] FCA 58 File number: NSD 1089 of 2016
Judgment of: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 20 February 2024
Catchwords: PATENTS — where liability heard and determined before relief — where respondents found to have infringed patent — determination of the quantum of pecuniary relief — where applicants elected to claim damages for Orifinder Tools used in Australia and elected to claim an account of profits for Orifinder Tools exported from Australia — whether the "split" election is valid — where s 122(1) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) refers to the option of either damages or an account of profits — whether the right to elect arises in relation to each and every infringement — held that the "split" election is valid DAMAGES — where experts agree on the overall methodology for approaching calculation of damages but where there are specific contested issues that relate to the underlying assumptions — whether contingencies identified by the respondents mean there should be a discount — consideration of Generic Health Pty Ltd v Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft [2018] FCAFC 183; (2018) 267 FCR 428 — consideration of the appropriate utilisation threshold which triggers the manufacture of additional ACT Tools — whether the cost of manufacturing additional ACT Tools should include optional components — whether 80 converted tools should be taken into account in assessing the lost profits claim by way of lost rental opportunities in 2015 — whether the 80 tools form part of or are in addition to the 412 tools for the purpose of assessing the lost profits claim by way of rental opportunities from 1 January 2016 to April 2019 — whether the manufacture and supply of Orifinder v3B Tools in 2012 were lost opportunities PATENTS — account of profits — whether losses made by respondents in periods should be excluded from profit calculations — whether there are profits earned by the respondents in Laos, Indonesia and New Zealand which should be taken into account — whether discount should be made to take account of tax related contingencies — whether interest should be calculated on the profits minus amounts paid by way of taxation
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate