Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Bingo Industries Pty Ltd; Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Tartak [2024] FCA 121 File number(s): NSD 647 of 2022 NSD 648 of 2022
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 23 February 2024
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – cartel conduct – making an arrangement containing a cartel provision – giving effect to a cartel provision – where corporate offender provided collections services and processing services for building and demolition waste in the Sydney metropolitan region – where the offender and its chief executive officer pleaded guilty – consideration of objective seriousness of the cartel offences – consideration of appropriate discounts for mitigating factors including plea of guilty and cooperation with law enforcement agencies – consideration of specific and general deterrence in sentencing cartel conduct – consideration of totality principle and parity with sentence imposed on co-offenders – consideration whether disqualification order should be made under s 86E of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – appropriate sentence
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 45AB, 45AF, 45AG, 79(1), 86E, 154X, 155 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 206B(1), 206G Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Pt IB, ss 16A, 16AC, 16BA, 16C, 17A, 19AC, 20(1)(b), 20AB Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Pt 2 Div 3, Pt 5, ss 7, 17C, 17D, 66, 67, 69, 73, 73A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate