Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Guo [2024] FCA 125 File number(s): VID 126 of 2024
Judgment of: BUTTON J
Date of judgment: 20 February 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 23 February 2024
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – ex parte application for interim travel restriction orders under s 1323 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) – where defendant is the subject of an ASIC investigation into alleged contraventions of ss 181–184 of the Act and ss 81–82 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) – where travel restriction is necessary or desirable to protect interests of aggrieved persons – interim orders made
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 13 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180–184, 440D, 1323 Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) ss 81, 82
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 318 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (No 3) (2006) 57 ACSR 307; [2006] FCA 433 Australian Securities and Investments Commission; in the matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Carey (No 19) (2008) 65 ACSR 421; [2008] FCA 38 Australian Securities and Investments Commissioner v Johnston [2009] FCA 1276
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 27
Date of hearing: 20 February 2024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate