Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogawa v Australian Information Commissioner (No 3) [2024] FCA 135 File number: QUD 387 of 2021
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 22 February 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – where the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondents costs, either as agreed or to be fixed in a lump sum by a Registrar – where the applicant informally applies for the review of a Registrar's costs decision – where the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) provide a procedure to challenge a taxation of costs but not where costs have been awarded in a lump sum – whether specific procedure should be prescribed for the challenge of a lump sum costs decision – procedure akin to challenge of taxation of costs decision ordered
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 1.21, r 1.32, r 40.02, r 40.34, r 40.35
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 22 February 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant did not appear
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms S Amos
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Holding Redlich
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS QUD 387 of 2021
BETWEEN: MEGUMI OGAWA Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER First Respondent
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS Second Respondent
order made by: LOGAN J DATE OF ORDER: 22 FEBRUARY 2024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate