Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nadeem v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2024] FCA 165 Appeal from: Nadeem v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 1453
File number(s): NSD 595 of 2021
Judgment of: HORAN J
Date of judgment: 29 February 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside order made in applicant's absence refusing leave to appeal from interlocutory judgment of Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where applicant did not appear at hearing – whether to determine in applicant's absence – no explanation for absence at previous hearing and no reasonably arguable case disclosed – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 17.04, 35.32 and 39.05(a)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 318 Lal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2014] FCA 892 Nadeem v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1498 Ogawa v Buckingham (No 2) [2023] FCA 1387 Sandhu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] FCA 1429
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 21
Date of hearing: 29 February 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate