Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia NDBR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 168 Review of: NDBR and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] AATA 4042
File number: VID 4 of 2023
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 1 March 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Tribunal affirmed decision of Minister's delegate to refuse to grant a Temporary Protection (Class XD) visa pursuant to s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – denial of procedural fairness by Tribunal – failure to follow recommendations of medical practitioner in conduct of hearing – failure not remedied by Tribunal – applicant prejudiced – decision of Tribunal quashed – remitted to Tribunal for determination according to law.
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 39(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 195A, 476A, 500, 501 Legal Services Direction 2017 (Cth) s 2 of Appendix B Aronson et al, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (7th ed, Lawbook, 2022)
Cases cited: Australian Postal Commission v Hayes (1989) 23 FCR 320; [2001] FCA 266 Australian Postal Corp v Bessey (2001) 32 AAR 508; [2001] FCA 266 Boensch v Pascoe (2019) 268 CLR 593; [2019] HCA 49 Craine v Mutual Fire Insurance Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 305 DBB16 v Commonwealth of Australia [2022] FCA 783 DXJL v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1124 Escobar v Spindaleri (1986) 7 NSWLR 51 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Grundt v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd (1937) 59 CLR 641 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Lawrie v Lawler (No 3) [2016] NTCA 3 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 66 Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Morehead (1912) 15 CLR 333 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421; [2019] HCA 3 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (2015) 256 CLR 326; [2015] HCA 40 Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 113 CLR 475 MZZMG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 234 FCR 180; [2015] FCAFC 134 NDBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1631 NDBR v Minister for Home Affairs and Another (2021) 286 FCR 336; [2021] FCAFC 170 Perera v MIMA (1999) 92 FCR 6; [1999] FCA 507 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 6 Scott v Handley (1999) 58 ALD 373; [1999] FCA 404 SZAAJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 312 Tuimaseve v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 396 Regina (Hill) v Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales [2014] 1 WLR 86
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate