Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lingard v Commonwealth Bank Officers Superannuation Corporation Pty Limited [2024] FCA 174 File number(s): QUD 388 of 2022
Judgment of: SARAH C DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 4 March 2024
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) affirming decision of first respondent – first respondent decided appellant was not a dependant and so was not entitled to any benefit from deceased member's superannuation fund – whether AFCA failed to take into account a relevant consideration – whether decision legally unreasonable – whether decision infected by actual or apparent bias ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) – where respondents filed objections to competency –whether notice of appeal discloses a question of law – where self-represented appellant – whether appropriate for Court to frame questions in order to found jurisdiction
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1053(1)(j), 1055, 1057 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 4AA(2), 44(5) Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) s 10 Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth) s 37(6) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 33.30 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.04AAAA Succession Act 2006 (NSW) s 57(1)(b)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate