Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Peros v Blackburn [2024] FCA 177 File number: QUD 405 of 2023
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2024
Catchwords: DEFAMATION – application for hearing of separate question on whether claimant suffered serious harm – where application made under r 30.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – factors relevant to appropriateness of separate hearing – application refused
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Defamation Act 2005 (Qld) Defamation Act 2013 (UK)
Cases cited: Amersi v Leslie [2023] EWHC 1368 (KB) Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing (2019) 271 FCR 632 Banks v Cadwalladr [2023] 3 WLR 167 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed (2010) 278 ALR 232 Dingle v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1964] AC 371 Hun v Aljazeera International (Malaysia) SDN BHD [2023] FCA 1103 Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2018] QB 594 Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2020] AC 612 Selkirk v Hocking (No 2) [2023] FCA 1085 Selkirk v Hocking [2023] FCA 432 Sivananthan v Vasikaran [2023] EMLR 7 Whittington v Newman [2024] NSWCA 27
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate