Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants (No 4) [2024] FCA 179 File number(s): NSD 1016 of 2021
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 6 March 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to file a further Statement of Claim – proposed further Statement of Claim fundamentally flawed – application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Ch 1, Div 4, Pt 1.5 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 357, 358, 359 Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth), s 12
Cases cited: Banque Commerciale SA, en liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd [1990] HCA 11; (1990) 169 CLR 279 Betfair Pty Ltd v Racing New South Wales (2010) 189 FCR 356 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Glengallan Investments Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 55; (2004) 218 CLR 471 Moffett v Dental Corporation Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 344; (2019) 286 IR 21 On Call Interpreters and Translators Agency Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2011] FCA 366; (2011) 214 FCR 82 Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd t/as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants [2023] FCAFC 155 Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants [2022] FCA 662
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 55
Date of hearing: 7 February 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate