Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ross v Attorney-General (Cth) [2024] FCA 180 File number(s): VID 888 of 2023
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 7 March 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension of time and for leave to appeal orders made by the primary judge, inter alia, dismissing the proceeding – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37M Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 4.12, 4.13, 35.13 Guardianship and Administration Act 2009 (Vic), s 179 Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 15
Cases cited: Barnett v Minister for Housing & Aged Care (1991) 31 FCR 400 BQQ15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 218 Decor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57; (1992) 177 CLR 292 Ex-Christmas Islanders Association Inc v Attorney-General (Cth) [2005] FCA 1867; (2005) 149 FCR 170 McInnis v The Queen [1979] HCA 65; (1979) 143 CLR 575 Ross v Commonwealth of Australia [2022] VSC 457 Ross v Commonwealth of Australia [2022] VSC 779 SZHTI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 702
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate