Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kidd v Kwek (No 2) [2024] FCA 194 File number(s): VID 321 of 2021
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 1 March 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 5 March 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where second, third and fourth respondents have failed to comply with Court orders and failed to appear – where second, third and fourth respondents have failed to file notice of address for service – where second, third and fourth respondents in default of appearance – applicant entitled to relief in relation to oppression and derivative claims for breaches of fiduciary duties and ss 180-183 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – relief granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180, 181, 182, 183, 232, 233 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 4.05(2), 5.22, 5.23, 20.21
Cases cited: BJ International Limited v Asghar (No 2) [2013] FCA 580 Chamberlain Group, Inc v Giant Alarm System Co, Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1606 Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Bata Shoe Co of Australia Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 230 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Limited (1990) 27 FCR 388 Maylord Equity Management Pty Ltd v Parazelsus Ltd [2014] FCA 979 Pilmer v The Duke Group Ltd (in liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165 Yeo v Damos Earthmoving Pty Ltd, in the matter of Beachwood Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2011] FCA 1129
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate