Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Faruqi v Hanson (evidence rulings) [2024] FCA 225 File number: NSD 372 of 2023
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 12 March 2024
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin – Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), s 18C – "piss off back to Pakistan" –relevance of evidence of the subjective effect of the impugned conduct on particular people – relevance of expert witness evidence on rhetoric, social psychology and social epidemiology, including as to constitutional facts in relation to the implied freedom of political communication EVIDENCE – Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth), s 16(3) – scope of paragraph (c) exclusion – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – hearsay – tendency – opinion – probative value and prejudicial effect
Legislation: Constitution Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 10, 44(3), 48, 59, 60, 64, 66A, 78, 97(1), 135, 136, 192A(a) Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth) s 16 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Pt IIA, ss 18C, 18D Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.04 Bill of Rights 1688 (1 Will & Mary, Sess 2 c 2) Art 9
Cases cited: Beitzel v Crabb [1992] 2 VR 121 Breen v Sneddon [1961] HCA 67; 106 CLR 406 Bropho v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [2004] FCAFC 16; 135 FCR 105 Buchanan v Jennings (AG of New Zealand intervening) [2005] 1 AC 115 (PC) Coleman v Sellars [2000] QCA 465; 181 ALR 120 Commonwealth Freighters Pty Ltd v Sneddon [1959] HCA 11; 102 CLR 280 Commonwealth v Vance [2005] ACTCA 35; 158 ACTR 47 Creek v Cairns Post Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1007; 112 FCR 352 Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103; 197 FCR 261 Hagan v Trustees of the Toowoomba Sports Ground Trust [2000] FCA 1615 Hamilton v Al Fayed [2001] 1 AC 395 (HL) Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; 263 CLR 338 Jones v Scully [2002] FCA 1080; 120 FCR 243 Laurance v Katter [2000] 1 Qd R 147 Leyonhjelm v Hanson-Young [2021] FCAFC 22; 282 FCR 341 Maloney v The Queen [2013] HCA 28; 252 CLR 168 McGlade v Lightfoot [2002] FCA 1457; 124 FCR 106 Minister for Home Affairs v Lee [2021] FCAFC 89 North Eastern Dairy Co Ltd v Dairy Industry Authority (NSW) [1975] HCA 45; 134 CLR 559 Office of Government Commerce v Information Commissioner (Attorney General Intervening) [2008] EWHC 774; [2010] QB 98 Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321 (PC) R v Theophanous [2003] VSCA 78; 141 A Crim R 216 Rann v Olsen [2000] SASC 83; 76 SASR 450 Re GHI (a protected person) [2005] NSWSC 466 Thomas v Mowbray [2007] HCA 33; 233 CLR 307 Toben v Jones [2003] FCAFC 137; 129 FCR 515 Unions NSW v New South Wales [2019] HCA 1; 264 CLR 595 Vanderstock v Victoria [2023] HCA 30
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate