Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. v Kingdom of Spain (security for costs) [2024] FCA 234 File number: NSD 602 of 2019
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 13 March 2024
Catchwords: PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW – privileges of consular officials – Vienna Convention on Consular Relations – whether ordering foreign state to provide security for costs in its application to assert consular immunity would infringe on consular immunity PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs – where application made for foreign state to provide security for costs in application by that state for the court to reconsider ex parte examination orders naming consular officers – power of the court to order security for costs – whether a party has a right to challenge orders made against it ex parte unfettered by the imposition of conditions such as provision of security for costs – exercise of discretion
Legislation: Consular Privileges and Immunities Act 1972 (Cth) s 5 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 53, 54, 56, 59(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 19.01, 39.05(a), 41.01, 41.10(1), Sch 1 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 108 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 38.02(3) Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, opened for signature 24 April 1963, 596 UNTS 261 (entered into force 19 March 1967), Arts 40, 44
Cases cited: A1 for Maintenance Pty Ltd v Lehal Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1476 Australian Federation of Islamic Councils Inc v Westpac Banking Corp (1988) 17 NSWLR 623 Bryan E Fencott & Associates Pty Ltd v Eretta Pty Ltd [1987] FCA 102; 16 FCR 497 Cameron v Cole [1944] HCA 5; 68 CLR 571 Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2016] FCAFC 170; 344 ALR 558 Eiser Infrastructure Ltd v Kingdom of Spain [2020] FCA 157; 142 ACSR 616 Fiorentino v Irons [1997] FCA 1425; 79 FCR 327 Juan Ysmael & Co Inc v Government of the Republic of Indonesia [1955] AC 72 Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 28; 388 ALR 315 Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. (No 3) [2021] FCAFC 112; 392 ALR 443 Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. [2021] FCAFC 3; 284 FCR 319 Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. [2023] HCA 11; 275 CLR 292 Lal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2014] FCA 892 Madgwick v Kelly [2013] FCAFC 61; 212 FCR 1 Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd v Generic Health Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 230; 140 IPR 109 Savcor Pty Ltd v Cathodic Protection International APS [2005] VSCA 213; 12 VR 639 Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc v MacLaine Watson & Co Ltd (No 2) [1988] 1 WLR 16 Davies, M et al Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia (10th ed., LexisNexis Butterworths, 2020)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate