Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Joy v UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Limited (No 3) [2024] FCA 279 File number: WAD 31 of 2021
Judgment of: FEUTRILL J
Date of judgment: 25 March 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory applications for recusal, particular discovery and to give testimony and to appear and make submissions via video link
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37, 37M, 47(3), 47(4), 47(5), 47(6), 47A, 47B, 47C(1), 47C(2), 47C(6) Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.28, 20.11, 20.14, 20.21; Pt 16
Cases cited: Blackrock Asset Management Australia Services Limited v Waked (No 2) [2011] FCA 479 Campaign Master (UK) Ltd v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2009] FCA 1306; (2009) 181 FCR 152 Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment) [2020] FCA 486 Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29; (2021) 273 CLR 289 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Rio Tinto Coal Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 462; (2014) 232 FCR 560 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Joy v UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Limited [2021] FCA 1282 Joy v UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 1086 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1990] HCA 31; (1990) 170 CLR 70 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; (2001) 205 CLR 507 Southernwood v Brambles Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 973
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate