Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Talbot v Tesolin Consulting Pty Limited trading as Ray White Quakers Hill (No 2) [2024] FCA 319 File number(s): NSD 41 of 2023
Judgment of: GOODMAN J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2024
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs pursuant to s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – no unreasonable acts or omissions established – costs discretion not enlivened – application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 569, 569A, 570 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 26.12
Cases cited: Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner [2015] FCAFC 20; (2015) 229 FCR 221 Nichols v NFS Agribusiness Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 84; (2018) 97 NSWLR 681 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 Talbot v Tesolin Consulting Pty Limited trading as Ray White Quakers Hill [2023] FCA 925
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr H Pararajasingham
Solicitor for the Applicant: Michael Vassili Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Miles
Solicitor for the Respondent: Jemmeson Fisher Legal
ORDERS NSD 41 of 2023
BETWEEN: SHELDON TALBOT Applicant
AND: TESOLIN CONSULTING PTY LIMITED T/AS RAY WHITE QUAKERS HILL Respondent
order made by: GOODMAN J DATE OF ORDER: 3 april 2024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate