Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Inas Karem Holdings Pty Ltd v Secretary, Department of Health and Aged Care [2024] FCA 352 Appeal from: Inas Karem Holdings Pty Ltd and Secretary, Department of Health and Aged Care [2023] AATA 754
File number: NSD 353 of 2023
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 10 April 2024
Catchwords: HEALTH LAW – pharmaceutical benefits – where applicant had approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits from certain premises but was no longer carrying on business from those premises – where in those circumstances s 98(3) of National Health Act 1953 (Cth) gives Departmental Secretary discretion to cancel approval – where approval cancelled by delegate of Departmental Secretary and applicant applied for review in Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether Tribunal erred in law in affirming cancellation – whether Tribunal failed to give any or any adequate reasons for its decision – whether Tribunal failed to exercise its discretion – whether Tribunal failed to consider applicant's claims, arguments and evidence – whether Tribunal assumed that matters which enlivened discretion were determinative of its exercise
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43(2B), 44 National Health Act 1953 (Cth) ss 90, 98(3)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593 ARM Constructions Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 10 FCR 197 Karabolovska v Comcare [2019] FCA 2153; 81 AAR 116; 169 ALD 117 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Shaffer v Secretary, Department of Health and Aged Care (2002) 124 FCR 234 WH Soul Pattinson & Co Ltd v Secretary, Department of Health and Family Services (1997) 74 FCR 339
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate