Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents (No 4) [2024] FCA 362 On remittal from: Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 202
File number(s): NSD 1343 of 2018
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2024
Catchwords: COSTS – revision of costs order of the first instance proceedings in light of remittal decision – discretion as to costs – costs to follow the event
Cases cited: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents (No 3) [2024] FCA 212 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents [2020] FCA 778; (2020) 382 ALR 400 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents (No 2) [2020] FCA 974; (2020) 155 IPR 454 Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 202; (2021) 286 FCR 572
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Number of paragraphs: 12
Date of last submission/s: 28 March 2024
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr D Shavin KC, Ms C Cochrane SC
Solicitor for the Appellant: Gilbert + Tobin
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Dimitriadis SC, Ms E Whitby
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS NSD 1343 of 2018
BETWEEN: ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 660 715) Appellant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate