Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Kocic (No 2) [2024] FCA 372 File number(s): NSD 1201 of 2021
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 16 April 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where leave sought to file an amended originating application pursuant to r 8.21 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (FCR) – where leave sought to file a statement of claim – where joinder of parties sought pursuant to r 9.05 of the FCR – where amended originating application, accompanying statement of claim and joinder are in aid of the relief sought pursuant to s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) (Conveyancing Act) – whether amendment to pleadings is based on the same facts or substantially the same facts as those already pleaded – whether this Court has jurisdiction in respect to the claim sought to be brought pursuant to s 37A of the Conveyancing Act
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 175 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.32-1.35, 8.21, 9.05 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 37A
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 1; (2001) 204 CLR 559 Bryant (Liquidator) v L.V. Dohnt & Co Pty Ltd, in the Matter of Gunns Limited (In Liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2018] FCA 238 Carter, in the matter of Spec FS NSW Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [2013] FCA 1027; (2013) 225 FCR 79 Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal (No 6) [2016] FCA 762; (2016) 339 ALR 560 Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal [2012] FCA 1507 CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53; (2004) 224 CLR 98 Darcy v Medtel Pty Ltd (No 3) [2004] FCA 807 DCJ21 v Medical Board of Australia [2021] FCA 1037 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ghaly [2016] FCA 707 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Kocic [2023] FCA 1353 Draney v Barry [1999] QCA 491; [2002] 1 Qd R 145 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 118 Fina Research SA v Halliburton Energy Services Inc [2002] FCA 1281 Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Limited [1995] HCA 68; (1995) 183 CLR 563 Lakatamia Shipping Co Ltd v Su [2014] EWCA Civ 636; [2015] 1 WLR 291 Mansfield (Liquidator) v Fortrust International Pty Ltd, in the matter of Palladium Investments International Pty Ltd (in liq) [2023] FCA 350 Marcolongo v Chen [2011] HCA 3; (2011) 242 CLR 546 McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc v Clurname Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 211; (2017) 123 ACSR 467 Rana v Google [2017] FCAFC 156; (2017) 254 FCR 1 Resort Lifestyle Developments Pty Ltd v NGI Savannah Living Communities Pty Ltd [2022] QSC 194; (2022) 12 QR 67 Rizeq v Western Australia [2017] HCA 23; (2017) 262 CLR 1 Royal v El Ali [2016] FCA 782 Singh v Super City Home Loans Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 646
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate