Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Crocker, in the matter of Crocker v Minister for Centrelink [2024] FCA 399 File number: NSD 1503 of 2023
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 19 April 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to institute proceeding where applicant subject to vexatious proceeding order – whether application for leave and supporting affidavit substantially comply with statutory requirements – whether proposed proceeding is a vexatious proceeding – where affidavit does not list all other proceedings instituted and does not disclose reasons for delay in making application – where proposed proceeding is without reasonable grounds and an abuse of process – application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(2A) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AM(1), 37AO, 37AR, 37AR(2), 37AR(3), 37AS, 37AS(1), 37AS(2), 37AS(3) and 37AT Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34 and 6.03
Cases cited: Crocker v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 84 Croker, in the matter of Croker [2019] FCA 359 Crocker, in the matter of Crocker [2019] FCA 432 Gargan, in the matter of Gargan [2018] FCA 871 Garrett, in the matter of Company One [2016] FCA 703 Infa-Secure Pty Limited v Crocker (No 2) (2016) 338 ALR 586; [2016] FCA 202 Infa-Secure Pty Ltd v Crocker (No 3) [2018] FCA 605 Infa-Secure Pty Limited v Crocker [2015] FCA 830 Katoa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2022) 403 ALR 604; [2022] HCA 28 Salomonn v Migration Agents Registration Authority (2014) 141 ALD 459; [2014] FCA 380 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate