Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kirkalocka Gold SPV Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Zenith Pacific (KLK) Pty Ltd, in the matter of Kirkalocka Gold SPV Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 428 File number: WAD 285 of 2023
Judgment of: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 29 April 2024
Catchwords: INSOLVENCY — application seeking declaration that the applicant is the legal and beneficial owner of the Zenith Power Plant — where Notice of cross-claim seeks declaration that the respondent is the legal and beneficial owner of the Zenith Power Plant — where the parties are parties to a Power Purchase Agreement — where respondent found to have actual possession of the Zenith Power Plant — whether the respondent had a "security interest" in the Zenith Power Plant by reason of s 12(1) of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA)— whether there is interest in personal property provided for by a transaction — whether the interest in personal property secures payment or performance of an obligation — whether the respondent had a "security interest" by reasons of s 12(3) of the PPSA — whether, if there is a security interest, it was perfected before the applicant went into administration — consideration of "apparent possession" — held: the cross-claim is upheld
Legislation: Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) ss 10, 12, 13, 19, 21, 24
Cases cited: Bredenkamp v Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, in the matter of Welldog Pty Ltd (In Liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] FCA 1065 Central Cleaning Supplies (Australia) Pty Ltd v Elkerton (in his capacity as joint and several liquidator of Swan Services Pty Ltd (in liq)) [2015] VSCA 92; (2015) 321 ALR 181 Collector of Customs (NSW) v Southern Shipping Company Ltd [1962] HCA 20; (1962) 107 CLR 279 De Bourbel Pty Ltd (in liq) v Distilleria Pty Ltd [2023] SASC 88 Dura (Australia) Constructions Pty Ltd v Hue Boutique Living Pty Ltd [2014] VSCA 326; (2014) 49 VR 86 Flown Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) v Goldrange Pty Ltd [2016] WASC 419; (2016) 316 FLR 81 Gold Valley Iron Pty Ltd (in liq) v OPS Screening & Crushing Equipment Pty Ltd [2022] WASCA 134 Hobbs v Petersham Transport Co Pty Ltd [1971] HCA 26; (1971) 124 CLR 220 Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia [2020] HCA 19; (2020) 271 CLR 1 In re Couston, Ex parte Watkins (1873) LR 8 Ch 520 Knauf Plasterboard Pty Ltd v Plasterboard West Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] FCA 866; (2017) 254 FCR 559 Management 3 Group Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Lenny's Commercial Kitchens Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 663; (2011) 281 ALR 482 Re Arcabi Pty Ltd (in liq); ex parte Theobold [2014] WASC 310; (2014) 288 FLR 236 South Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman [1896] 2 QB 44 Strange Investments (WA) Pty Ltd v Coretrack Ltd [2014] WASC 281; (2014) 107 IPR 102 Palmer N, Palmer on Bailment (3rd ed, Sweet & Maxwell, 2009) Tyler ELG, Young PW and Croft CE, Fisher & Lightwood's Law of Mortgage (3rd Australian ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2014)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate