Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ezy-Fit Engineering Group Pty Limited v Microm Nominees Pty Limited [2024] FCA 441 File number: SAD 99 of 2019
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 3 May 2024
Catchwords: CONTRACT - agency - principal and agent - ostensible authority - implied actual authority - general principles - contract to buy lathe and milling machine - whether contract made between purchaser and dealer in Australia or between purchaser and manufacturer in Poland CONTRACT - construction - pre-contractual representations - whether terms implied - whether statements in technical brochures incorporated as express terms SALE OF GOODS - general principles - liability of seller - fitness for purpose - whether breach of term implied under s 14(a) Sale of Goods Act 1895 (SA) CONSUMER LAW - allegation of misleading or deceptive conduct contrary to s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) - conduct by way of representations made in technical brochures - pre-contractual representations - whether machine was defective and failed to perform in accordance with representations - reliance - whether representations were misleading CONSUMER LAW - pleading of numerous disaggregated representations - whether pre-commissioning and post-commissioning representations made DAMAGES - where delivery time estimated - whether delay in performance caused applicants to lose tender for lucrative opportunity to manufacture periscopes - whether delay in performance had impact on receipt of government grant DAMAGES - general principles - whether machine capable of repair - whether rectification reasonable - rectification costs - whether allowance should be made for rectification costs where damages assessed under s 236 of the ACL DAMAGES - assessment of damages - loss of profits - whether defective machine resulted in lost opportunity to profit from high-end work - appropriate method of calculating damages - hypothetical alternative purchase - assessment of probability of opportunity eventuating - fair compensation - date and period of assessment - calculation TORT - negligence - standard of care of manufacturer EVIDENCE - expert evidence - where evidence of valuer rejected at trial - whether reasoning of valuer disclosed EVIDENCE - parliamentary privilege - whether s 16 of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth) prohibits using statements made in a Senate Estimates Committee hearing for making factual findings EVIDENCE - whether failure to call witnesses gives rise to Jones v Dunkel inference
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate