Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Commissioner of Taxation v Bazzo [2024] FCA 452 File number: WAD 57 of 2023
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 2 May 2024
Catchwords: TAXATION - assessable income - where Commissioner issued notices of assessment pursuant to s 167 of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) (ITAA36) - where assessments based on asset betterment statement - whether taxpayer discharged her onus under s 14ZZK(b)(i) of ITAA36 to prove assessments were excessive or otherwise incorrect - whether taxpayer required to prove all amounts subject of assessment are not taxable in order to discharge onus ('all or nothing' approach) - whether Tribunal erred in failing to make a finding as to taxpayer's assessable income - held 'all or nothing' approach rejected - held Tribunal made findings as to extent of taxpayer's income - appeal dismissed TAXATION - penalties - where Tribunal found 20% uplift on shortfall penalty under Schedule 1, s 284-220(1)(c) of Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) did not apply because no penalty had been applied 'previously' - where Tribunal incorrect as to meaning of 'previously' - whether Tribunal erred in failing to consider submissions advanced by taxpayer that penalty should be remitted - held Tribunal failed to consider submissions regarding remittance - cross-appeal allowed ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - merits review of objection decision by a Tribunal - where Commissioner issued amended assessments under s 170(1) of ITAA36 on basis that there had been fraud or evasion - where Tribunal found that Commissioner had held the requisite opinion - whether Tribunal erred in its approach on review in determining whether there was fraud or evasion by not forming its own opinion - held Tribunal required to form its own opinion as to fraud or evasion
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate