Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Praljak v State of Queensland [2024] FCA 467 Applications for extension of time and leave to appeal from: Praljak v State of Queensland [2022] FCA 1437 Praljak v Department of Defence [2021] FCA 1668 Praljak v Commonwealth of Australia (Federal Court of Australia) [2022] FCA 1438 Praljak v Bond University Limited [2022] FCA 1439
File numbers: VID 40 of 2024 VID 41 of 2024 VID 42 of 2024 VID 43 of 2024
Judgment of: MORTIMER CJ
Date of judgment: 6 May 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications for extensions of time in which to seek leave to appeal – applications relate to four proceedings in which the applicant was refused leave to bring proceedings under s 46PO(3A) of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) – applications for leave to appeal made between 13 months and 23 months out of time – materials disclose no explanation for delay – applications for leave to appeal have no prospects of success – applications for extensions of time refused – applications for leave to appeal would also have been refused
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO(3A) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Magistrates Act 1991 (Qld) s 51
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate