Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Petrovsky v Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Incorporated [2024] FCA 500 File number: VID 359 of 2024
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 14 May 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for urgent interlocutory relief – where urgent injunctive relief sought to maintain applicants' access to respondents' premises, and enforcement of purported oral undertakings given by the respondents – whether there is a prima facie case for relief – alleged breach of joint venture agreement or licence to occupy – whether previous application for urgent interlocutory relief on similar grounds was wrongly decided – whether balance of convenience favours injunctive relief – where previous second application for urgent interlocutory relief was refused by duty judge – application for interlocutory relief dismissed again
Cases cited: Petrovsky v Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Inc [2024] FCA 396
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 35
Date of hearing: 10 May 2024
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr J Vidanage of Old Port Chambers
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms L Viant of Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr T Duggan KC
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Dentons Australia Limited
ORDERS VID 359 of 2024
BETWEEN: NIKOLAI PETROVSKY First Applicant
VAXINE PTY LTD Second Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate