Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zirk-Sadowski v University of New South Wales (No 3) [2024] FCA 515 File number(s): VID 680 of 2022
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 16 May 2024
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – Application for judicial review – where the Fair Work Commission refused to grant an extension of time to bring an application to deal with a dismissal dispute under s 366 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) – where the Fair Work Commission also refused to make confidentiality orders under s 594 of the FW Act – where the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission refused to grant permission to appeal either of the decisions at first instance – whether the Fair Work Commission fell into jurisdictional error – application for judicial review dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2016) 247 FCR 138 Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Montgomery v Child Support Registrar [2015] FCA 891 Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union [2015] 234 FCR 405
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 60
Date of hearing: 9 April 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant was self-represented
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate