Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
ToolGen Incorporated v Fisher (No 3) [2024] FCA 539 File number: NSD 1909 of 2018
Judgment of: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 23 May 2024
Catchwords: PATENTS – application to amend claims following determination of appeal under s 60(4) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ("the Act") – whether proposed amendments allowable under s 102 of the Act – correction of obvious mistake – discretion Held: order made pursuant to s 105(1A) of the Act
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 40(2), (3), (3A), 102, 105(1A) Patents Act 1949 (UK) s 31(1)
Cases cited: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Apotex Pty Ltd (2010) 87 IPR 516 Cytec Industries Inc. v Nalco Company [2019] FCA 1800 Fina Research SA v Halliburton Energy Services Inc (2003) 127 FCR 561 Holtite Ltd v Jost (Great Britain) Ltd [1979] RPC 81 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd (2016) 247 FCR 61 Meat & Livestock Australia Ltd v Cargill, Inc (No 2) (2019) 139 IPR 47 Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v Generic Partners Pty Ltd (No 2) (2019) 139 IPR 424 Novartis AG v Arrow Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 139 ToolGen Incorporated v Fisher (No 2) [2023] FCA 794 TA Blanco White, Patents for Inventions, 5th ed. Stevens & Sons, London, 1983
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate