Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
FXF18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 549 File number(s): NSD 995 of 2023
Judgment of: HALLEY J
Date of judgment: 24 May 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – leave to appeal and associated extension of time – appeal from primary judge's interlocutory orders – whether primary judge's reasons for making interlocutory orders attended with sufficient doubt and whether potential for substantial prejudice if leave not granted – whether primary judge should have recused herself for reasonable apprehension of bias – whether primary judge was correct to dismiss application to reopen case – extension of time granted but application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 37M and 37N Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 65(1)(b) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.15
Cases cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170; [1981] HCA 39 Burgess v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 259 FCR 197; [2018] FCA 69 Charisteas v Charisteas (2021) 273 CLR 289; [2021] HCA 29 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397; [1991] FCA 844 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 FXF18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FedCFamC2G 729 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488; [2010] HCA 48 Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 161 Ogawa v President of the Australian Human Rights Commission (Leave to Appeal) [2022] FCAFC 161 Sharman Licence Holdings Ltd v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 802
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate