Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Energy Regulator v Santos Direct Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 579 File number(s): VID 862 of 2023
Judgment of: NESKOVCIN J
Date of judgment: 4 June 2024
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – application for declaration of contravention of the National Gas Rules (NGR) – failure to keep contemporaneous records in relation to renominations – where respondents admitted contravening the NGR –pecuniary penalties pursuant to s 44AAG(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – whether proposed penalties appropriate – order for implementation of an assurance program – contribution to costs
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 4(1), 44AE, 44AAG(1)-(2)(a), (c)-(d) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 21, 43 National Gas (New South Wales) Act 2008 (NSW) s 7 National Gas (Queensland) Act 2008 (Qld) s 7 National Gas (South Australia) Act 2008 (SA) s 7, Schedule National Gas (South Australia) Regulations (SA) National Gas (Victoria) Act 2008 (Vic) s 7 National Gas Law ss 2, 26, 91BRO, 234 National Gas Rules rr 593, 647, 648(4), 651(1)(c)-(e), 653(1), 655(3), 663, 664, 666(1)(a)-(d), 677, 678
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; 254 FCR 68 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; 274 CLR 450 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 450; 75 FCR 238; 145 ALR 36 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v BlueScope Steel Limited (No 6) [2023] FCA 1029 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Uber B.V. [2022] FCA 1466 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; 262 FCR 243 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61; 127 CLR 421 J McPhee & Son (Australia) Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2000] FCA 365; 172 ALR 532 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited [1990] FCA 762; [1991] ATPR 41-076 Trade Practices Commission v TNT Australia Pty Ltd [1995] ATPR 41-375 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2021] FCAFC 49; 284 FCR 24
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate