Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lian Fa International Dining Business Corporation v Mu (No 2) [2024] FCA 630 File number(s): NSD 1124 of 2021
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 12 June 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 14 June 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application by the respondents for an adjournment of the trial dates – where the fifth application by the parties for an adjournment – application allowed
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sch 2 ss 18, 29 Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M(1) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 120(1), 120(2) Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW) rr 4.1.1, 4.1.3, 4.1.4
Cases cited: Agius v State of South Australia (No 4) [2017] FCA 361 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 BSY16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 140 EPH17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 824; 166 ALD 47 Jarrett v Westpac Banking Corp [1999] FCA 425 Lian Fa International Dining Business Corporation v Mu [2021] FCA 1527 Pallas v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 149 Timu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 161
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate