Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wikeley v Kea Investments Ltd [2024] FCA 631 File number(s): QUD 117 of 2024
Judgment of: DOWLING J
Date of judgment: 14 June 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for security for costs – applicant found to be involved in an unlawful conspiracy in New Zealand – applicant has insufficient assets to meet an adverse costs order – applicant is a natural person – whether leave to appeal has reasonable prospects of success – security for costs ordered – quantum and timing of order
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 56 Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth), ss 25 and 26 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 19.01
Cases cited: Australian Equity Investors v Colliers International (NSW) Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 57 Bell Wholesale Co. Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 Botsman v Bolitho & Ors [2018] VSCA 111 Bryan E Fencott & Associates Pty Ltd v Eretta Pty Ltd (1987) 16 FCR 497 Clack v Collins (No 1) [2010] FCA 513 Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2016] FCAFC 170; (2016) 344 ALR 558 Cowell v Taylor (1885) 31 CH D 34 Decor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Etnyre v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2021] FCA 610 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Pty Ltd [No 35] [2001] NSWSC 60; (2001) 51 NSWLR 333 James v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No. 1) (1985) 9 FCR 442 Kea Investments Limited v Wikely Family Trustee Limited (in interim liquidation) [2023] NZHC 3532 Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley (No 2) [2023] QSC 215 Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley Family Trustee Limited (in interim liquidation) [2023] NZHC 3260 Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 764 KP Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 189 Logue v Hansen Technologies Ltd [2003] FCA 81; (2003) 125 FCR 590 Madgwick v Kelly [2013] FCAFC 61; (2013) 212 FCR 1 McCardle v Johnson [2023] FCA 1369 Pearson v Naydler [1977] 3 All ER 531; [1977] 1 WLR 899 Re Taylor: Ex parte Natwest Australia Bank Ltd [1992] FCA 296; 37 (1992) FCR 194 Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 90 Staff Development & Training Centre Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia [2005] FCA 1643 Stapleton v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1418 Tait v Bindal People [2002] FCA 322 Thomas v STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2011] FCA 254 Wikeley v Kea Investments Ltd [2023] QCA 255 Wikeley v Kea Investments Ltd [2024] FCA 155
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate