Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Simmons v Giezekamp [2024] FCA 649 File number(s): NSD 355 of 2024
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 7 June 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for continuation of freezing orders – application by interested party for variation of freezing orders – where interested party is a tenant in common of property the subject of freezing order – where interested party joint tenant of a property the subject of freezing order – freezing orders continued without variation
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46; 227 CLR 57 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 18; 198 CLR 380 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad [2010] FCA 1014; 273 ALR 194 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Huang [2021] HCA 43; 273 CLR 429 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 Ninemia Maritime Corp v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG [1984] 1 All ER 398 Nullagine Investments Pty Ltd v Western Australia Club [1993] HCA 45; 177 CLR 635 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Resort Hotels Management Pty Ltd v Resort Hotels of Australia Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 730 SCF Finance Co Ltd v Masri [1985] 2 All ER 747 Simmons v Giezekamp [2024] FCA 334 Taylor v Diamand & Zikos Developments Pty Ltd (1997) 6 NTLR 164 Third Chandris Shipping Corporation v Unimarine SA [1979] 1 QB 645
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate