Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Avard v Australian Capital Territory [2024] FCA 690 File number: ACD 29 of 2022
Judgment of: KENNETT J
Date of judgment: 28 June 2024
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – where applicant specialist in intensive care medicine – where applicant submitted reports of risks and injury using internal reporting system – where applicant directed to attend independent medical examination – where employer proposed that applicant would be suspended from duty with pay – where employee investigated for alleged clinical misconduct, improper workplace conduct and improper use of reporting system – where internal email regarding applicant's absence sent to staff – where employee transferred to alternative medical position pending outcome of investigation – whether investigations, transfer, internal email and proposed suspensions were adverse action within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) – whether actions were taken because of the exercise of a workplace right INDUSTRIAL LAW – proper approach where multiple people said to be involved in decision to take adverse action INDUSTRIAL LAW – whether action permitted by an enterprise agreement "authorised by or under" a "law of the Commonwealth" for the purposes of s 342(3)(a) of the FW Act INDUSTRIAL LAW – interpretation of enterprise agreement – where employer purported to follow preliminary assessment process to determine whether to commence formal investigation – where enterprise agreement provided that principles of procedural fairness applied – whether employer required to hear applicant on whether formal investigation should be commenced – whether failure to so hear applicant contravened s 50 of the FW Act
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate