Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chen v Insight Investment Management Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 719 File number(s): VID 423 of 2024
Judgment of: NESKOVCIN J
Date of judgment: 5 July 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for freezing order – whether the applicants have a good arguable case – whether there is a risk of dissipation of assets by the respondents – application for ancillary order detailing assets of the respondents – whether ancillary order is available if no freezing order is made
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.32, 7.33, 7.35
Cases cited: Basi v Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 743 Bayley & Associates Pty Ltd v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 746 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Huang [2021] HCA 43; 273 CLR 429 Gecko Australia Pty Ltd v Montagnese [2022] FCA 488 KTC v Singh [2018] NSWSC 1510 Merryport Pty Ltd v Lawson [2023] FCA 838 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Royal Express Pty Ltd (Recs and Mgrs Apptd) (Admins Apptd) v Huang [2021] FCA 585
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 27
Date of hearing: 2 July 2024
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr T Clarke
Solicitor for the Applicants: Gadens
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate