Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 28) (Kunjen Olkol and Kowanyama People jointly held area determination) [2024] FCA 744 File number: QUD 673 of 2014
Judgment of: MORTIMER CJ
Date of judgment: 12 July 2024
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – nomination of prescribed body corporate NATIVE TITLE – proper State respondent to the proceeding under ss 84(4) and 87A(1)(c) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – Arnaboldi v State of Queensland [2023] FCA 788 not followed
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 56, 57, 61, 66, 67, 84, 84D, 87A, 94A, 225
Cases cited: Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1849 Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 2) (Kuuku Ya'u determination) [2021] FCA 1464 Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 3) (Uutaalnganu (Night Island) determination) [2021] FCA 1465 Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 10) [2022] FCA 1129 Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 24) (Olkola determination) [2024] FCA 740 Taylor on behalf of the Yamatji Nation Claim v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 42
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Native Title
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate