Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lo Pilato in his capacity as Liquidator of RSD (Qld) Pty Ltd (in liq) v McLeod [2024] FCA 751 File number: ACD 35 of 2024
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2024
Date of publication of reasons: 10 July 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for orders pursuant to r 18.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) allowing liquidator to pay a dividend from the liquidation into Court – where dispute exists as to the entitlement to the receipt of the dividend – application granted
Legislation: Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Division: General Division
Registry: Australian Capital Territory
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 10
Date of hearing: 31 May 2024
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M Falcetta
Solicitor for the Applicants: Trinity Law
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Mr P Hegarty of Hegarty Lawyers
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Mr Z Bentley of Irish Bentley Lawyers
Counsel for the Fourth Respondent: The Fourth Respondent did not appear
ORDERS ACD 35 of 2024
BETWEEN: FRANK LO PILATO First Applicant
JONATHON KINGSLEY COLBRAN Second Applicant
AND: BRENDAN MCLEOD First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate