Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Cirrus Real Time Processing Systems Pty Limited v Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 763 File number: NSD 1889 of 2019
Judgment of: KENNETT J
Date of judgment: 12 July 2024
Catchwords: CONTRACTS – formation – where parties engaged in negotiations – where respondents "committed" to subcontract the applicant if successful tenderer for work from New Zealand Defence Force – where respondents ultimately subcontracted a third party to perform relevant work – whether parties reached consensus on terms of subcontract – whether alleged contract uncertain as mere agreement to agree – whether parties intended to be legally bound CONTRACTS – interpretation – rectification by construction – where most likely that typographical error made during drafting process – where document not absurd – whether contract should be corrected by construction CONTRACTS – interpretation – meaning of "engage" – where applicant's construction commercially unreasonable and onerous CONTRACTS – implied terms – where alleged implied terms would impose duties to ensure the subcontracting of the applicant – where alleged implied terms would impose duties that would unreasonably restrict the respondents' commercial liberty – where alleged implied terms not so obvious they go without saying – whether alleged terms were implied ESTOPPEL – estoppel by convention – where alleged assumption is about future conduct, not state of affairs – where alleged estoppel would convert non-contractual representation into binding promise – whether respondents estopped from denying the existence of a contract
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 4, 82, 131, Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) ss 18, 236 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate