Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Master Wealth Control Pty Ltd (Penalty) [2024] FCA 795 File number: NSD 1104 of 2022
Judgment of: JACKMAN J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2024
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – remedies – disqualification order – civil penalty – non-party consumer redress order – injunctive relief PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to amend originating application – where amendment would substantially increase extent of penalty to which second defendant exposed – where second defendant did not give evidence at liability hearing – where regulator conceded that second defendant's evidence may realistically have affected outcome – amendment application refused pro tanto
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 137H, Sch 2 ('Australian Consumer Law') ss 224, 232, 239, 248 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 8.21
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Australian Building and Construction Commission v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; (2022) 274 CLR 450 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3; (2018) 262 CLR 157 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 5) [2021] FCA 1516; (2021) 157 ACSR 500 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 450; (1997) 145 ALR 36 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Campbell (No 3) [2021] FCA 528 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330; (2015) 327 ALR 540 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dell Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 983 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1637 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Geowash Pty Ltd (subject to a deed of company arrangement) (No 4) [2020] FCA 23; (2020) 141 ACSR 515 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Geowash Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 23; (2020) 141 ACSR 515 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2017] FCA 1018 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v High Adventure Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 247; (2006) ATPR 42–091 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 698 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Master Wealth Control Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 344 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Megasave Couriers Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 543 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Phoenix Institute of Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 859 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v viagogo AG (No 3) [2020] FCA 1423 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 262 FCR 243 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 292; (2010) 268 ALR 303 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 292; (2010) 268 ALR 303 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2020] FCA 790 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation [2019] FCA 2147 Cameron v R [2002] HCA 6; (2002) 209 CLR 339 Commissioner of Taxation v Pavihi [2019] FCA 2056 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; (2010) 269 ALR 1 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Domain Register Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 2008 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mathers v Commonwealth [2004] FCA 217; (2004) 134 FCR 135 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; (2022) 403 ALR 398 Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2004] HCA 42; (2004) 220 CLR 129 Sharrment Pty Ltd v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1988) 18 FCR 449 Siganto v R [1998] HCA 74; (1998) 194 CLR 656 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; (2012) 287 ALR 249
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate